Education focused on economic growth has produced upward trends in literacy and credentials alongside downward trends in agency, humanistic values, relationships, and civic engagement, motivating a shift toward human flourishing¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoreticalr2·q1
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? Education systems oriented to economic growth show positive trends in literacy, numeracy, enrolment, merit, credentials and technology but negative trends in agency, humanistic values, relationships and civic engagement, which the assessment argues warrants reorienting education toward human flourishing. → Singh 2025
Evidence¶
Singh 2025¶
Singh, N. C., Gilead, T., Chakraborty, A., Van Herwegen, J., van Atteveldt, N., Borst, G., Bugden, S., Jasinska, K., Kay, J., Pugh, K., & Duraiappah, A. (2025). A new education agenda based on The International Science and Evidence Based Education Assessment. npj Science of Learning 10, 24. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00288-w
q1 · i? · theoretical · r2
Assessment-level position statement: the ISEE Assessment, a transdisciplinary review by nearly 300 scientists from 45 countries, concluded for "a shift in education’s focus from economic growth to fostering human flourishing". This is an argumentative synthesis, not a measured comparison.
"nearly 300 scientists from 45 countries conducted the assessment, calling for a shift in education’s focus from economic growth to fostering human flourishing."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Civic Mindedness — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Technology's role in education is dual: it can facilitate human flourishing when designed and implemented with attention to context, but can impede learning outcomes and produce harms when implemented without caution — related
- Current AIED rests on five faulty assumptions that risk learner dependence, isolation, and reduced flourishing — related
- The agent/consumer distinction is not primarily technical sophistication but capacity to interrogate the assumptions of AI outputs — related
- Excessive dependence on AI may reduce human interaction and dehumanize adult education — related
- Agency metaphors expressed fear that GenAI steals human agency and threatens jobs, reflecting a binary human-versus-machine model — related
- The ISEE Assessment finds that meritocracy as the great equalizer perpetuates educational, social and economic exclusion and proposes shifting from static merit-based assessment to potentiality — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
education-economic-growth-versus-flourishing-trends |
title |
Education focused on economic growth has produced upward trends in literacy and credentials alongside downward trends in agency, humanistic values, relationships, and civic engagement, motivating a shift toward human flourishing |
description |
Education focused on economic growth has produced upward trends in literacy and credentials alongside downward trends in agency, humanistic values, relationships, and civic engagement, motivating a shift toward human... |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — singh-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.