Self-efficacy profiles differ in AI use for educational support (η² = .36), the highest-rated support type in the high profile¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2·i3large
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i3 AI use for educational support differed significantly across profiles, F(2,99) = 27.84, p < .001, η2 = .36, with the High profile highest (M = 4.68) and the Low profile lowest (M = 2.41). → Suriá-Martínez R 2026
Evidence¶
Suriá-Martínez R 2026¶
Suriá-Martínez R, García-Castillo F, López-Sánchez C and García del Castillo JA (2026). Between perceived competence and artificial intelligence: academic self-efficacy profiles in university students with motor disabilities. Front. Educ. 11:1956192. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1956192
q2 · i3 · associational · r2
One of three one-way ANOVAs using self-efficacy profile as independent variable and the three AI support modalities as dependent variables (N = 102). The quote fragment "AI use for educational support" grounds this measure; means were 4.68 (High), 3.56 (Moderate), 2.41 (Low).
"The ANOVA results confirmed statistically significant differences among profiles, F(2,99) = 27.84, p < .001, η2 = .36, indicating a significant association between academic self-efficacy profile and AI use for educational support."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Higher academic self-efficacy profiles report greater overall academic AI use, with a large effect (η² = .36) — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Self-efficacy profiles differ in AI use for informational support (η² = .28) and emotional support (η² = .18) — related
- The four profiles differ in academic self-efficacy, time/study management, and effort regulation, with HL highest, but not in help seeking — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
educational-support-ai-use-profile-differences |
title |
Self-efficacy profiles differ in AI use for educational support (η² = .36), the highest-rated support type in the high profile |
description |
Self-efficacy profiles differ in AI use for educational support (η² = .36), the highest-rated support type in the high profile |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — suriá-martínez-r-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.