Self-efficacy profiles differ in AI use for informational support (η² = .28) and emotional support (η² = .18)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr1·q2·i3large
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i3 Informational support use differed significantly across profiles, F(2,99) = 18.92, p < .001, η2 = .28, with High profile students reporting more frequent use to locate, synthesize, and organize academic information (M = 4.51). → Suriá-Martínez R 2026
q2 i3 Emotional support use also differed significantly, F(2,99) = 10.47, p < .001, η2 = .18, with the High profile highest (M = 3.96) and the Low profile lowest (M = 2.76). → Suriá-Martínez R 2026 (2)
Evidence¶
Suriá-Martínez R 2026¶
Suriá-Martínez R, García-Castillo F, López-Sánchez C and García del Castillo JA (2026). Between perceived competence and artificial intelligence: academic self-efficacy profiles in university students with motor disabilities. Front. Educ. 11:1956192. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1956192
q2 · i3 · associational · r1
One-way ANOVA on the informational support dimension of the Perception of AI Utility Questionnaire across the three profiles (N = 102). The quote fragment "F(2,99) = 18.92, p < .001, η2 = .28" grounds the large effect; means were 4.51, 3.74, and 2.83.
"Similarly, AI use for informational support differed significantly across the three latent profiles, F(2,99) = 18.92, p < .001, η2 = .28."
Suriá-Martínez R 2026 (2)¶
Suriá-Martínez R, García-Castillo F, López-Sánchez C and García del Castillo JA (2026). Between perceived competence and artificial intelligence: academic self-efficacy profiles in university students with motor disabilities. Front. Educ. 11:1956192. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1956192
q2 · i3 · associational · r1
One-way ANOVA on the emotional support dimension across the three profiles (N = 102). The quote fragment "η2 = .18" grounds the effect, which the article labels moderate but which meets the η² ≥ .14 large threshold; means were 3.96, 3.31, and 2.76.
"Finally, significant differences were also observed in AI use for emotional support across the three latent profiles, F(2,99) = 10.47, p < .001, η2 = .18."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Self-efficacy profiles differ in AI use for educational support (η² = .36), the highest-rated support type in the high profile — related
- Higher academic self-efficacy profiles report greater overall academic AI use, with a large effect (η² = .36) — a broader claim this one bears on
- Three academic self-efficacy profiles (low, moderate, high) are identified among university students with motor disabilities using Latent Profile Analysis — related
- The four achievement goal profiles differ significantly in use of motivation regulation strategies (interest enhancement, motivational self-talk, emotional control) — related
- The four achievement goal profiles differ significantly in all four dimensions of writing self-efficacy — related
- The four profiles differ in academic self-efficacy, time/study management, and effort regulation, with HL highest, but not in help seeking — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
informational-emotional-support-ai-use-profile-differences |
title |
Self-efficacy profiles differ in AI use for informational support (η² = .28) and emotional support (η² = .18) |
description |
Self-efficacy profiles differ in AI use for informational support (η² = .28) and emotional support (η² = .18) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — suriá-martínez-r-2026, suriá-martínez-r-2026-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.