Claims

Educators used epistemic networks to examine closed-loop communication strategies during debriefing

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The results indicate that educators effectively utilised epistemic networks to examine closed-loop communication strategies during guided team reflection. → Zhao 2026

Evidence

Zhao 2026

Zhao, L., Echeverria, V., Gašević, D., Yan, L., Alfredo, R., Li, X., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2026). Automated multimodal visual analytics of social and epistemic dimensions in team communication for reflective practice in healthcare simulation. Computers & Education, 252, 105655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105655

q2 · i? · qualitative · r?

The article's summary of findings from the qualitative analysis of 28 debriefing sessions states that educators "utilised social networks to guide reflection on engagement and roles, and epistemic networks to examine closed-loop communication strategies". The acknowledging code indexes closed-loop communication in the epistemic network.

"The results indicate that educators effectively utilised social networks to guide reflection on engagement and roles, and epistemic networks to examine closed-loop communication strategies."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.