Claims

Learners and educators perceived social and epistemic networks as useful for supporting reflective activities on team communication

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Learners and educators reported perceived usefulness of the network visualisations for facilitating reflection on team communication, rated on a 7-point Likert scale in interviews. → Zhao 2026

Evidence

Zhao 2026

Zhao, L., Echeverria, V., Gašević, D., Yan, L., Alfredo, R., Li, X., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2026). Automated multimodal visual analytics of social and epistemic dimensions in team communication for reflective practice in healthcare simulation. Computers & Education, 252, 105655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105655

q2 · i? · qualitative · r?

Perceptions were gathered through interviews with 15 learners and 5 educators, who rated usefulness on a 7-point Likert scale and explained their ratings. The article reports that the identified comprehensibility and perceived usefulness suggest the potential feasibility of adapting the networks into pedagogical instruments.

"Lastly, we further interviewed these learners and the 5 educators who led the reflection sessions to explore the perceived usefulness of these networks in facilitating reflection on communication (RQ3)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.