Almost no model-and-harness combination sustains tutoring over the full 30-day horizon, as learning plateaus within 5–10 days¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Every agent plateaus in per-day student accuracy within 5–10 virtual days far below the ideal-learning reference, so almost no combination converts the full 30 days into sustained gain. → Lee 2026
q2 i? 53.3% of runs produce no learning gain (∆Solve ≤ 0) and 48.5% show no curriculum structure (Gagné below 1.5). → Lee 2026 (2)
Evidence¶
Lee 2026¶
Lee, U.; Lee, S.; Jeong, Y.; Lee, E.; Shin, M.; Kwon, H. (2026). EduClaw-Bench: A Long-Horizon Benchmark for Pedagogical LLM Agents with Simulated Learners. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.03206 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.03206
q2 · i? · design · r2
Per-day student accuracy trajectories over 30 virtual days on the Codex tier with three representative adapters. Every adapter plateaus by day 5–10, with openclaw moving only from 0.28 to 0.29.
"Overthefullhorizonthe leftpanelofFigure2showseveryagentplateauswithin5–10 days far below steady learning (openclaw0.28→0.29)."
Lee 2026 (2)¶
Lee, U.; Lee, S.; Jeong, Y.; Lee, E.; Shin, M.; Kwon, H. (2026). EduClaw-Bench: A Long-Horizon Benchmark for Pedagogical LLM Agents with Simulated Learners. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.03206. doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.03206
q2 · i? · design · r2
Analysis of four pedagogical failure modes across runs on the Codex tier. "thedominantfailuresarestructural" with no-curriculum affecting 48.5% and no-learning-gain affecting 53.3% of runs. metaclaw is the only adapter to mostly escape the no-curriculum mode (10% of runs).
"butthedominantfailuresarestructural, with48.5%of runs showing no curriculum (Gagné below 1.5) and53.3%producing no learning gain (∆Solve≤0)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Tutoring quality belongs to the base model and agent harness together rather than either alone, as adapter rankings reorder across tiers — related
- The simulated learner tracks a real-student KT model with calibration error 0.049, and the helpfulness rubric transfers to real classroom transcripts — related
- Learning paths used for SRL improved accuracy and performance without increasing effort, and tutoring-system benefits required sustained practice — related
- Relearning dynamics depend on unlearning strength: agents with 10% unlearning recover within early interaction rounds, while 30% and 50% agents show prolonged low-accuracy plateaus and delayed improvement — related
- LoRA RFT with a helpfulness-weighted composite reward can collapse an adapter's pedagogy mid-training while responsiveness stays intact — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
educlaw-bench-plateau-within-days |
title |
Almost no model-and-harness combination sustains tutoring over the full 30-day horizon, as learning plateaus within 5–10 days |
description |
Almost no model-and-harness combination sustains tutoring over the full 30-day horizon, as learning plateaus within 5–10 days |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
recheck_by |
2029 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — lee-2026, lee-2026-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.