Claims

Learning paths used for SRL improved accuracy and performance without increasing effort, and tutoring-system benefits required sustained practice

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (3 entries) · review r2–r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Using learning paths for SRL did not increase student effort, but accuracy improved, resulting in increased learning performance and transfer. → Rebecka Rundquist 2024 q2 i? Students did not improve in calibrating their abilities, showing less overestimation but higher underestimation. → Rebecka Rundquist 2024 (2) q2 i? Students needed at least 69 days of practice, a minimum of three minutes a day, to make substantial progress with a tutoring system used as a classroom complement. → Rebecka Rundquist 2024 (3)

Evidence

Rebecka Rundquist 2024

Rebecka Rundquist, Kristina Holmberg, John Rack, Zeynab Mohseni and Italo Masiello. (2024). Use of Learning Analytics in K–12 Mathematics Education: Systematic Scoping Review of the Impact on Teaching and Learning. Journal of Learning Analytics 11(3). https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2024.8299

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports Molenaar et al.'s (2020) comparison of two groups using a DLS with learning paths against three groups using the same DLS without them, with lessons beginning by setting goals from extracted analytics.

"Results indicated that using the learning paths for SRL did not increase student effort, but their accuracy improved, resulting in increased learning performance and transfer."

Rebecka Rundquist 2024 (2)

Rebecka Rundquist, Kristina Holmberg, John Rack, Zeynab Mohseni and Italo Masiello. (2024). Use of Learning Analytics in K–12 Mathematics Education: Systematic Scoping Review of the Impact on Teaching and Learning. Journal of Learning Analytics 11(3). https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2024.8299

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review reports a secondary calibration outcome from Molenaar et al. (2020): no improvement in calibration, with a shift from overestimation toward underestimation of abilities.

"Although students did not improve in their calibration of their abilities , they did show less overestimation but, at the same time, higher levels of underestimation."

Rebecka Rundquist 2024 (3)

Rebecka Rundquist, Kristina Holmberg, John Rack, Zeynab Mohseni and Italo Masiello. (2024). Use of Learning Analytics in K–12 Mathematics Education: Systematic Scoping Review of the Impact on Teaching and Learning. Journal of Learning Analytics 11(3). https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2024.8299

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports Qushem et al.'s (2022) finding on dosage when the tutoring system was used as a complement to regular classroom activity, and that for young students use supported transfer of arithmetic fluency to more advanced domains.

"students needed to practise for at least 69 days for a minimum of three minutes a day in order to make substantial progress"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id learning-paths-srl-accuracy-without-effort
title Learning paths used for SRL improved accuracy and performance without increasing effort, and tutoring-system benefits required sustained practice
description Learning paths used for SRL improved accuracy and performance without increasing effort, and tutoring-system benefits required sustained practice
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 3 — rebecka-rundquist-2024, rebecka-rundquist-2024-2, rebecka-rundquist-2024-3

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.