Claims

Effortful control shows no significant relationship with mathematics anxiety in grade VII students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The main effect of effortful control (high vs low, split at the median) on mathematics anxiety was not significant, F(1, 94) = .052, p>.05. → Sharma 2016

Evidence

Sharma 2016

Sharma, Y. (2016). Alleviating mathematics anxiety of elementary school students: A situated perspective. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 2(2), 509-517. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1110268

q2 · i? · causal · r1

In the same 2×2 ANCOVA of the quasi-experiment (n=99, covariate pre-mathematics anxiety), the effortful control main effect was non-significant: "F (1, 94) = .052, p>0.05". No effect size was printed for this null finding; equivalence was not tested.

"From Table 2, it can be seen that F (1, 94) = .052, p>0.05 is not significant. It indicates that mathematics anxiety was not correlated with effortful control of grade VII students."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.