Claims

Instruction through the situated learning model significantly reduces mathematics anxiety of seventh-grade students compared with traditional teaching

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i2 After a 25-day treatment, seventh graders taught with the situated learning model had significantly lower mathematics anxiety than controls taught by traditional method, with eta for treatment of .35 (medium to large). → Sharma 2016

Evidence

Sharma 2016

Sharma, Y. (2016). Alleviating mathematics anxiety of elementary school students: A situated perspective. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 2(2), 509-517. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1110268

q2 · i2 · causal · r2

Non-equivalent control group quasi-experiment with 99 seventh graders (49 experimental, 50 control) in two purposively selected schools; 2×2 ANCOVA on mathematics anxiety scores with pre-mathematics anxiety as covariate. The article prints F (1, 94) = 49.853, p<0.01, and the printed effect size eta for treatment was .35, which the article calls medium to large. Adjusted means were 68.98 (situated) vs 78.21 (traditional).

"From Table 2, it can be seen that F (1, 94) = 49.853, p<0.01 is significant. Eta for treatment was .35, which, according to Cohen (1988) is medium to large effect."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.