Claims

Elaborative interrogation produced lower posttest accuracy than reading the lesson twice in a written lesson on posterior probability

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Participants in the elaborative interrogation condition had lower posttest item accuracy than participants in the read-twice condition. → Clinton 2016

Evidence

Clinton 2016

Clinton, V., Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2016). Learning About Posterior Probability: Do Diagrams and Elaborative Interrogation Help? The Journal of Experimental Education, 84(3), 579-599. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2015.1048847

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Mixed-effects model on posttest item accuracy in a randomized 3x3 factorial experiment with undergraduates (N = 198 analyzed after removing 47 who passed the pretest). The article reports that "participants in the elaborative interrogation condition had lower posttest item accuracy than did participants in the read-twice condition". No effect size printed.

"participants in the elaborative interrogation condition had lower posttest item accuracy than did participants in the read-twice condition, B = 3.75, Wald Z = 13.81, p < .001"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id elaborative-interrogation-lower-posttest-than-read-twice-posterior-probability
title Elaborative interrogation produced lower posttest accuracy than reading the lesson twice in a written lesson on posterior probability
description Elaborative interrogation produced lower posttest accuracy than reading the lesson twice in a written lesson on posterior probability
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — clinton-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.