Claims

E-learning programs significantly improve nurses' pressure injury classification skills when scored as a continuous outcome (pooled SMD 2.53)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Pooled analysis of studies reporting classification skills as a continuous outcome found a statistically significant difference favoring e-learning over usual or standard education programs (pooled SMD = 2.53; 95%CI: 1.03–4.03; I² = 96.2%). → Ding 2024

Evidence

Ding 2024

Ding, Y., Qian, J., Zhou, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Effect of e‐learning program for improving nurse knowledge and practice towards managing pressure injuries: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Nursing Open, 11, e2039. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.2039

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Random-effects meta-analysis of the subset of included trials scoring classification skills continuously, shown in Figure 4. The review reports "pooled SMD = 2.53" with a significant difference; sensitivity analysis showed no single-study effects.

"However, the pooled analysis based on studies reporting the classification skills as continuous outcome has found a statistically significant difference in classification skills in nurses receiving e‐learning programs when compared to usual or standard education programs (pooled SMD = 2.53; 95%CI: 1.03–4.03; I 2 = 96.2%; Figure 4)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.