Claims

E-learning programs significantly improve nurses' knowledge of pressure injury management compared with no e-learning (pooled SMD 1.40, with substantial heterogeneity)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Nurses receiving e-learning had significantly higher knowledge gain for managing pressure injuries than nurses that did not receive e-learning, with a pooled SMD of 1.40 (95%CI: 0.45–2.35; I² = 93.1%). → Ding 2024

Evidence

Ding 2024

Ding, Y., Qian, J., Zhou, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Effect of e‐learning program for improving nurse knowledge and practice towards managing pressure injuries: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Nursing Open, 11, e2039. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.2039

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Random-effects meta-analysis of four studies reporting nurse knowledge outcomes, pooled as standardized mean differences. The review reports "pooled SMD was 1.40" with p < 0.004; no standardized effect-size category beyond the SMD is printed, so impact is unclassified. Sensitivity analysis showed no single-study effects.

"The pooled SMD was 1.40 (95%CI: 0.45–2.35; I 2 = 93.1%). This shows that nurses receiving e‐learning had significantly higher knowledge gain for managing pressure injuries compared to nurses that did not receive e‐learning, with p‐value of <0.004"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.