No significant post-test attitude difference was found between the e-learning-taught group and the conventionally taught group when both were pre-tested¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Post-test attitude scores of group E (e-learning module) and group C1 (conventional method) did not differ significantly (mean difference 5.850, Sig. 0.199); equivalence was not tested. → Daniel M. Getuno 2015
Evidence¶
Daniel M. Getuno 2015¶
Daniel M. Getuno, Joel K. Kiboss, Johnson M. Changeiywo, & Leo B. Ogola. (2015). Effects of an E-Learning Module on Students' Attitudes in an Electronics Class. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.36. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1086475
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Null pairwise comparison between the e-learning group E and the conventionally taught group C1, both of which received the pre-test. The article reports that "no significant differences e xist between these two groups at post-test"; no effect size is printed and equivalence was not tested.
"For groups E and C 1 the results show that no significant differences e xist between these two groups at post-test. It would also be reasonable to expect significant d ifferences in the post-test mean scores because gro up E received the treatment while C 1 did not."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students taught with the e-learning module showed a significantly larger gain in attitudes from pre-test to post-test than students taught by the conventional method — related
- The conventionally taught pre-tested group and the e-learning-taught unpre-tested group did not differ significantly in post-test attitudes — related
- The only significant pairwise post-test difference in attitudes was between two e-learning-taught groups differing only in pre-test exposure, favouring the pre-tested group — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Groups E and C1 were homogeneous in entry attitudes, with no significant pre-test difference — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.