Claims

No significant post-test attitude difference was found between the e-learning-taught group and the conventionally taught group when both were pre-tested

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Post-test attitude scores of group E (e-learning module) and group C1 (conventional method) did not differ significantly (mean difference 5.850, Sig. 0.199); equivalence was not tested. → Daniel M. Getuno 2015

Evidence

Daniel M. Getuno 2015

Daniel M. Getuno, Joel K. Kiboss, Johnson M. Changeiywo, & Leo B. Ogola. (2015). Effects of an E-Learning Module on Students' Attitudes in an Electronics Class. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.36. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1086475

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Null pairwise comparison between the e-learning group E and the conventionally taught group C1, both of which received the pre-test. The article reports that "no significant differences e xist between these two groups at post-test"; no effect size is printed and equivalence was not tested.

"For groups E and C 1 the results show that no significant differences e xist between these two groups at post-test. It would also be reasonable to expect significant d ifferences in the post-test mean scores because gro up E received the treatment while C 1 did not."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.