Claims

School-mean fall GMADE pretest scores strongly predicted spring posttest math achievement in the year-one EM trial

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? A one standard deviation increase in school pretest score was associated with a .88 increase in outcome scores (coefficient 0.882, p < .0001). → Michael Vaden-Kiernan 2015

Evidence

Michael Vaden-Kiernan 2015

Michael Vaden-Kiernan, Geoffrey Borman, Sarah Caverly, Nance Bell, Veronica Ruiz de Castilla, and Kate Sullivan. (2015). Preliminary Findings from a Multi-Year Scale-Up Effectiveness Trial of Everyday Mathematics. SREE Spring 2015 Conference Abstract. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED562455

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Year-one three-level multilevel model of the cluster-randomized trial; Table 2 prints the GMADE pretest coefficient 0.882 (SE 0.055, t = 16.100, p < .0001). The article reports the school mean pretest "is predictive of the posttest achievement". No standardized effect size is printed.

"A one standard deviation increase in school pretest score is associated with a .88 increase in outcome scores."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.