A 2025 systematic review reports that AI tools raising social presence and emotional engagement may improve AI-supported collaborative learning outcomes¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · checked against its sources 2026-10-17 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? AI tools that increase social presence and emotional engagement make learners feel more connected to the learning process, improving collaborative learning outcomes. → Kovari 2025
Evidence¶
Kovari 2025¶
Kovari, A. (2025). A systematic review of AI-powered collaborative learning in higher education: Trends and outcomes from the last decade. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101335
q2 · i? · review · r2
The review's synthesis of affective-factor studies (narrative review attributing this to Molina-Barron et al., 2023, and Avsec et al., 2022) reports that AI-driven systems tracking emotional cues can intervene to re-engage students emotionally. No effect sizes are printed.
"AI tools that increase social presence and emotional engagement can make learners feel closer and more connected to the learning process, thus improving AI-based collaborative learning outcomes"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Social Awareness and Relationship Skills — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- AI-powered multimodal approaches tracking emotional and physiological responses increase student engagement and motivation in collaborative learning — related
- Interactivity, information sharing, and collaborative environment are each positively associated with perceived social presence in agentic AI-supported online learning — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Positive learning communities and collaborative social interaction drive learning — a broader claim this one bears on
- Learning motivation and perceived social presence are both positively associated with learner engagement in agentic AI-supported online learning — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- A 2024 vendor white paper cites research that avatars provide social presence and that realistic avatars in intelligent tutoring systems can increase student-tutor engagement — related
- Excessive dependence on AI may reduce human interaction and dehumanize adult education — reports the opposite
- AI use also carries negative outcomes: technical instability, negative emotional impacts, over-reliance, and contextual contingency — related
- Social presence influences how social interaction unfolds in online group learning, which in turn affects learning outcomes — related
- Challenging study demands combined with resources boost emotional engagement, though interaction effects on cognitive and behavioral engagement were mainly nonsignificant — related
- CASTLE's interaction hypothesis states that social processes influence and are influenced by motivational, emotional, and metacognitive processes — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
emotional-engagement-social-presence-ai-collaborative-learning |
title |
A 2025 systematic review reports that AI tools raising social presence and emotional engagement may improve AI-supported collaborative learning outcomes |
description |
A 2025 systematic review reports that AI tools raising social presence and emotional engagement may improve AI-supported collaborative learning outcomes |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
source_checked |
2026-10-17 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-12 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — kovari-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.