Enactive encoding yields higher cued recall than verbal encoding, and the enactment effect remains stable across learning cycles¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Learners recalled significantly more nouns after enactment than verbal encoding across all interim tests, with no Encoding Type × Cycle interaction. → Kubik 2022

Evidence¶

Kubik 2022¶

Kubik, V., Jemstedt, A., Mahjub Eshratabadi, H., Schwartz, B. L., & Jönsson, F. U. (2022). The underconfidence-with-practice effect in action memory: The contribution of retrieval practice to metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09288-2

q3 · i? · causal · r2

In the interim-test recall analysis of the experiment, enactment outperformed verbal encoding: "Learners recalled significantly more nouns after enactment than verbal encoding across all tests"; recall also increased across cycles with no reliable Encoding Type × Cycle interaction.

"Learners recalled significantly more nouns after enactment than verbal encoding across all tests, F(1, 57) = 12.66, p < 0.001, ϖ 2 = 0.091"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Learners' JOLs are sensitive to the enactment benefit even when encoding type is manipulated between subjects — related
• Calibration of JOLs shifts toward underconfidence across learning cycles for action phrases under both verbal and enactive encoding, without first-cycle overconfidence — related
• Enactment impairs resolution of JOLs relative to verbal encoding of action phrases — related