Claims

Student and teacher engagement with the values-affirmation exercise declined notably by the fourth administration

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Both student and teacher engagement with the exercise declined notably by the fourth affirmation exercise, which the authors believe may have dampened the intervention's impact. → Dominique Bradley 2015

Evidence

Dominique Bradley 2015

Dominique Bradley, Evan Crawford, Sara E. Dahill-Brown. (2015). Fidelity of Implementation in a Large-Scale, Randomized, Field Trial: Identifying the Critical Components of Values Affirmation. SREE Spring 2015 Conference Abstract. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED562183

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Fidelity analysis across the four exercise administrations during the 2011-2012 school year found engagement declined by the fourth exercise for both students and teachers; the authors interpret this as a possible dampening effect on intervention impact.

"We find notable declines in both student and teacher engagement with the exercise by the fourth affirmation exercise. We believe that these results could indicate a dampening effect on the impact of the intervention in our sample."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.