Claims

Fidelity of implementation varied substantially across schools and classrooms in the scaled-up values-affirmation trial, particularly in teacher-centered delivery

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In the scaled-up intervention, fidelity varied substantially across schools and classrooms, with the greatest variation in teacher-centered delivery of the intervention. → Dominique Bradley 2015

Evidence

Dominique Bradley 2015

Dominique Bradley, Evan Crawford, Sara E. Dahill-Brown. (2015). Fidelity of Implementation in a Large-Scale, Randomized, Field Trial: Identifying the Critical Components of Values Affirmation. SREE Spring 2015 Conference Abstract. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED562183

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Fidelity analysis of the MWAP trial using classroom debrief reports and end-of-year teacher surveys. Table 1 reports average teacher compliance of 72% overall, ranging from 64% to 83% across high and low student-affirmation subgroups across 275 reports.

"in this scaled up intervention we find substantial variation in fidelity across schools and classrooms, particularly in terms of the teacher-centered delivery of the intervention (see Table 1)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.