Claims

Early preclinical exposure group outperformed late exposure group on theory, OSCE communication, and empathy measures

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 Ali et al. found the early preclinical exposure group scored higher on theory (82% vs 76%, d = 1.55), OSCE communication (85% vs 78%, d = 2.15), and empathy (83% vs 75%, d = 2.28) than the late exposure group. → Gadbail AR 2026

Evidence

Gadbail AR 2026

Gadbail AR, Gondivkar SM, Yuwanati M, Sonone A, Dhamande M, Panchbhai A, Sarode SC. (2026). Early clinical exposure in undergraduate dental education: a systematic review of effectiveness, experiences, and outcomes. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-08692-z

q2 · i3 · review · r2

The review reports, citing Ali et al., a non-randomized quasi-experimental comparison (n = 150) where "theory mean 82% vs. 76%, p = 0.002, d = 1.55" favoring early preclinical exposure over late exposure.

"Group A showed significantly higher academic performance (theory mean 82% vs. 76%, p = 0.002, d = 1.55), OSCE communication (85% vs. 78%, p = 0.004, d = 2.15), empathy (83% vs. 75%, p = 0.005, d = 2.28)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.