Intervention duration in weeks and study-quality characteristics did not significantly moderate extensive reading effects¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Duration in weeks was not a significant moderator (β = −0.002, p = .669), and no study characteristic (peer review, design, random assignment, randomization level, quality) significantly moderated effects. → Sangers 2025
Evidence¶
Sangers 2025¶
Sangers, N. L., van der Sande, L., Welie, C., Dobber, M., & van Steensel, R. (2025). Learning a Language Through Reading: A Meta-analysis of Studies on the Effects of Extensive Reading on Second and Foreign Language Learning. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10068-6
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
Meta-regression of intervention duration in weeks across all effect measures combined. The article reports the duration moderator was not significant (β = −0.002, SE = 0.004, p =.669); the study-characteristics moderator analyses (Table 4) also revealed no significant effects, and study quality was non-significant (β = 0.06, p =.346).
"The continuous variable that indicated the duration of the interventions in weeks was not found to be significant (β = −0.002, SE = 0.004, p =.669)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Interventions lasting one to two months show the largest effect, and effects do not increase consistently with longer duration — related
- Writing intervention effects for US ELL students do not vary significantly by study quality indicators, participant characteristics, or intervention characteristics — related
- Single-case effects of self-management interventions are not moderated by intervention characteristics (duration, fidelity assessment, fidelity method, or training) — related
- Contextual variables (educational level, language context, study design, duration, intensity) do not significantly moderate the effects of ICT-supported writing interventions — related
- Interventions in higher Grades tend to have somewhat lower effect sizes; other study characteristics show few significant moderator effects — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
er-duration-study-characteristics-null-moderators |
title |
Intervention duration in weeks and study-quality characteristics did not significantly moderate extensive reading effects |
description |
Intervention duration in weeks and study-quality characteristics did not significantly moderate extensive reading effects |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — sangers-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.