Interventions in higher Grades tend to have somewhat lower effect sizes; other study characteristics show few significant moderator effects¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Meta-regressions revealed few significant moderators: interventions in higher Grades tend to have somewhat lower effect sizes, with no significant differences between QES and RCTs, general tests and subdomain tests, or math and reading tests. → Dietrichson 2021
Evidence¶
Dietrichson 2021¶
Dietrichson, J., Filges, T., Seerup, J. K., Klokker, R. H., Viinholt, B. C. A., Bøg, M., & Eiberg, M. (2021). Targeted school‐based interventions for improving reading and mathematics for students with or at risk of academic difficulties in Grades K‐6: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1152
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3
Meta-regression moderator analyses across participant and study characteristics in the review; the grade-level association is a tendency, the listed contrasts were not statistically significant, and no effect size is printed.
"Interventions in higher Grades tend to have somewhat lower effect sizes, whereas there were no significant differences between QES and RCTs, general tests and tests of subdomains, and math tests and reading tests."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Effect sizes based on mathematics tests are significantly larger than effect sizes based on reading tests in targeted secondary interventions — reports the opposite
- Single-case effects of self-management interventions are not moderated by intervention characteristics (duration, fidelity assessment, fidelity method, or training) — related
- Early reading interventions (Grades K–1) show larger effects than interventions provided in Grades 2–5 — related
- Targeted school-based interventions for Grades 7–12 students with or at risk of academic difficulties have positive, statistically significant short-run effects on standardised reading and maths tests (ES = 0.22) — related
- Targeted school-based interventions have positive short-term effects on standardised reading and mathematics tests for K-6 students with or at risk of academic difficulties — related
- SES–learning effect sizes did not differ by SES indicator or outcome type in an umbrella review's meta-regressions; differences by grade level and study year rested on one or two effect sizes — related
- Intervention duration in weeks and study-quality characteristics did not significantly moderate extensive reading effects — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
grade-level-moderates-effect-size |
title |
Interventions in higher Grades tend to have somewhat lower effect sizes; other study characteristics show few significant moderator effects |
description |
Interventions in higher Grades tend to have somewhat lower effect sizes; other study characteristics show few significant moderator effects |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — dietrichson-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.