The effect of selective auditory attention on early neural processing differs between children of higher and lower maternal education (significant group × attention interaction within 100–200 msec)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2009 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? In an ERP study of 32 children, the effect of selective attention on probe-evoked amplitudes differed by maternal education group (group × attention interaction significant). → Stevens Courtney 2009

Evidence¶

Stevens Courtney 2009¶

Stevens Courtney, Lauinger Brittni, Neville Helen. (2009). Differences in the neural mechanisms of selective attention in children from different socioeconomic backgrounds: An event-related brain potential study. Developmental Science, 12(4), 634-646. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00807.x

q3 · i? · associational · r1

ERP mixed-design ANOVA testing the effects of attention (attended/unattended), probe type, and maternal education group on probe-evoked mean amplitude at 100–200 msec in 32 children. The omnibus interaction was significant: "F(1, 30) = 13.4, P = .001". The main effect of group was not significant, F(1, 30) = 1.0, p = .32.

"Crucial to the hypothesis of the study, the group x attention interaction was significant, F(1, 30) = 13.4, P = .001, indicating that the effect of attention differed for children in the higher and lower maternal education groups"

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Auditory Processing — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes

Related Claims¶

• The maternal-education group difference in neural attentional modulation persists after controlling for receptive language scores — related
• Children of higher maternal education showed a significantly larger attention effect on neural responses (mean attended–unattended difference 1.7 vs. 0.6 μV) — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
• The group difference in neural attentional modulation is tied to reduced distractor suppression in the unattended channel, not to differences in response to attended stimuli — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• Children of higher and lower maternal education did not differ on on-task comprehension of attended stories during the ERP task — related
• ERPs reveal SES disparities in children's auditory attention filtering even when behavioral task performance shows no significant SES difference — a broader claim this one bears on
• Developmental differences in selective attention are related to neural systems for deploying attention and managing response conflict, while deployed selective attention acts through similar neural mechanisms across ages — related