The group difference in neural attentional modulation is tied to reduced distractor suppression in the unattended channel, not to differences in response to attended stimuli¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2009 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Children of lower maternal education showed a larger-amplitude response to unattended-channel probes, indicating reduced suppression; the two groups did not differ in the attended-channel response. → Stevens Courtney 2009
Evidence¶
Stevens Courtney 2009¶
Stevens Courtney, Lauinger Brittni, Neville Helen. (2009). Differences in the neural mechanisms of selective attention in children from different socioeconomic backgrounds: An event-related brain potential study. Developmental Science, 12(4), 634-646. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00807.x
q3 · i? · associational · r1
Supplemental direct comparison of the two maternal education groups on attended vs. unattended probe amplitudes in the 32-child ERP study. The higher maternal education group had "a smaller amplitude response to probes in the unattended channel" than the lower group, indicating better suppression; unattended probe response differed, "independent samples t(30) = −2.87, P < .01".
"whereas the two groups did not differ in response to probe stimuli in the attended channel, independent samples t(30) < 1, P = .40, the groups did differ in response to probe stimuli in the unattended channel, independent samples t(30) = −2.87, P < .01"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The maternal-education group difference in neural attentional modulation persists after controlling for receptive language scores — related
- Children of higher maternal education showed a significantly larger attention effect on neural responses (mean attended–unattended difference 1.7 vs. 0.6 μV) — a broader claim this one bears on
- The effect of selective auditory attention on early neural processing differs between children of higher and lower maternal education (significant group × attention interaction within 100–200 msec) — a broader claim this one bears on
- Children of higher and lower maternal education did not differ on on-task comprehension of attended stories during the ERP task — related
- Selective attention improves neural encoding of attended speech envelopes in children aged 7–12 — related
- Developmental differences in selective attention are related to neural systems for deploying attention and managing response conflict, while deployed selective attention acts through similar neural mechanisms across ages — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ses-distractor-suppression-deficit-not-signal-enhancement |
title |
The group difference in neural attentional modulation is tied to reduced distractor suppression in the unattended channel, not to differences in response to attended stimuli |
description |
The group difference in neural attentional modulation is tied to reduced distractor suppression in the unattended channel, not to differences in response to attended stimuli |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2009 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — stevens-courtney-2009 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.