Erroneous examples do not raise general confidence calibration but yield more high-confidence correct answers on the delayed posttest¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Confidence increased across sessions for both groups with no condition difference, but ErrEx students made more high-confidence correct responses on the delayed posttest (66.27% vs. 63.45%). → Bruce M. McLaren & Deanne M. Adams & Richard E. Mayer 2015
Evidence¶
Bruce M. McLaren & Deanne M. Adams & Richard E. Mayer 2015¶
Bruce M. McLaren & Deanne M. Adams & Richard E. Mayer. (2015). Delayed Learning Effects with Erroneous Examples: a Study of Learning Decimals with a Web-Based Tutor. International Artificial Intelligence in Education Society 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0064-x
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Confidence-rating analysis (six participants removed for logging errors; one item dropped). "Students in the ErrEx condition were more likely to make high confidence correct responses" on the delayed posttest; no other response-type differences were significant.
"For the delayed posttest, the only significant difference was for high confidence correct answers,F (1, 380)=5.07, MSE=.15,p =.03. Students in the ErrEx c ondition were more likely to make high confidence correct responses (M=66.27 %, SD=24.20 %) than students in the PS condition (M= 63.45 %, SD=26.33 %)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Erroneous examples and problem solving do not differ significantly on an immediate posttest — related
- Erroneous examples produce significantly higher delayed-test learning gains than problem solving for decimal learning — related
- Time on task does not explain the erroneous-examples delayed learning advantage — related
- The delayed erroneous-examples advantage replicated at one school but was not statistically significant at the other — related
- The delayed erroneous-examples benefit holds for both low and high prior knowledge students — related
- Students like problem solving more than erroneous examples and find its interface easier, though it yields weaker delayed learning — related
- Erroneous examples show no general learning benefit over correct examples in most comparisons, but outperform them for negative knowledge in some studies — related
- Intelligent Novice error-correction tutoring produced better delayed transfer and immediate isomorphic performance than the Expert tutor in spreadsheet learning — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
erroneous-examples-metacognitive-confidence-delayed |
title |
Erroneous examples do not raise general confidence calibration but yield more high-confidence correct answers on the delayed posttest |
description |
Erroneous examples do not raise general confidence calibration but yield more high-confidence correct answers on the delayed posttest |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — bruce-m-mclaren-deanne-m-adams-richard-e-mayer-2015 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.