Claims

Erroneous examples do not raise general confidence calibration but yield more high-confidence correct answers on the delayed posttest

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Confidence increased across sessions for both groups with no condition difference, but ErrEx students made more high-confidence correct responses on the delayed posttest (66.27% vs. 63.45%). → Bruce M. McLaren & Deanne M. Adams & Richard E. Mayer 2015

Evidence

Bruce M. McLaren & Deanne M. Adams & Richard E. Mayer 2015

Bruce M. McLaren & Deanne M. Adams & Richard E. Mayer. (2015). Delayed Learning Effects with Erroneous Examples: a Study of Learning Decimals with a Web-Based Tutor. International Artificial Intelligence in Education Society 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0064-x

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Confidence-rating analysis (six participants removed for logging errors; one item dropped). "Students in the ErrEx condition were more likely to make high confidence correct responses" on the delayed posttest; no other response-type differences were significant.

"For the delayed posttest, the only significant difference was for high confidence correct answers,F (1, 380)=5.07, MSE=.15,p =.03. Students in the ErrEx c ondition were more likely to make high confidence correct responses (M=66.27 %, SD=24.20 %) than students in the PS condition (M= 63.45 %, SD=26.33 %)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id erroneous-examples-metacognitive-confidence-delayed
title Erroneous examples do not raise general confidence calibration but yield more high-confidence correct answers on the delayed posttest
description Erroneous examples do not raise general confidence calibration but yield more high-confidence correct answers on the delayed posttest
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2015
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — bruce-m-mclaren-deanne-m-adams-richard-e-mayer-2015

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.