Embedded-source and document-source trustworthiness scores differed, suggesting an interplay between layers rather than one-layered reflection¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? ES scores differed from DS manipulation-check scores for high-trust sources. → Franco Londra 2025
q2 i? ES scores differed from DS scores for low-trust sources. → Franco Londra 2025 (2)
Evidence¶
Franco Londra 2025¶
Franco Londra, Magalí Martínez, Gaston Saux. (2025). Sources within sources: The dynamic influence of multiple documents trustworthiness when evaluating and using an embedded source. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-025-09427-z
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Wilcoxon-style contrast of ES trustworthiness scores against the DS manipulation check, reported in the Discussion. The article prints "HT-ES Mdn = 5, HT-DS Mdn = 8, W = 1385, p <.001, rpb =.736"; no standardized effect size in d-type units is printed, so impact is null.
"HT-ES Mdn = 5, HT-DS Mdn = 8, W = 1385, p <.001, rpb =.736"
Franco Londra 2025 (2)¶
Franco Londra, Magalí Martínez, Gaston Saux. (2025). Sources within sources: The dynamic influence of multiple documents trustworthiness when evaluating and using an embedded source. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-025-09427-z
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Same contrast for low-trust sources, reported in the Discussion. The article prints "LT-ES Mdn = 2.5, LT-DS Mdn = 1, W = 299 p =.005, rpb =.470"; the amplitude between high- and low-trust scores was larger for DS than ES.
"LT-ES Mdn = 2.5, LT-DS Mdn = 1, W = 299 p =.005, rpb =.470"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- References to the embedded source did not differ by sequence type, ranging from 17.6% to 35% across conditions
- Embedded-source trustworthiness evaluations do not change across positions when both document sources have similar trustworthiness — related
- After reading the first text, embedded-source trustworthiness evaluations did not vary between sequences — related
- Embedded-source trustworthiness evaluations shift toward the trustworthiness of the most recent document source in mixed sequences — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
es-and-ds-scores-differ-interplay |
title |
Embedded-source and document-source trustworthiness scores differed, suggesting an interplay between layers rather than one-layered reflection |
description |
Embedded-source and document-source trustworthiness scores differed, suggesting an interplay between layers rather than one-layered reflection |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — franco-londra-2025, franco-londra-2025-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.