The five essential supports reinforce each other and depend on a school environment infused with mutual trust¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2007 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The five essential supports can only flourish in a school environment infused with mutual trust, and a material weakness in any single support can undermine the others. → Luppescu 2007
Evidence¶
Luppescu 2007¶
Luppescu, Stuart, Hart, Holly, Rosenkranz, Todd, Montgomery, Nicholas, Sporte, Susan, and Sebring, Penny Bender. (2007). Consortium on Chicago School Research 2007 Individual School Survey Report. http://ccsr.uchicago.edu/ISR
q2 · i? · associational · r?
The report presents this interdependence claim as a lesson from CCSR's research program, pointing readers to its Essential Supports publications. No effect size or test statistic is printed for this claim.
"We at CCSR have learned that the five essential supports can on ly flourish in a school environment infused with mutual trust. At the same time, the supports reinforce each other , so that a material weakness in any single support can undermi ne the others."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Elementary schools strong in three or more of the five essential supports were ten times more likely to substantially improve student math and reading scores (attributed to Bryk et al., 2010) — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Fewer than 10 percent of elementary schools with a sustained weakness in one essential support showed improvements in student outcomes (attributed to Bryk et al., 2010) — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Elementary schools with clusters of three or more NBCTs demonstrate greater strength on 7 of 12 essential supports measures — related
- Artistic and social-emotional competencies are mutually reinforcing — related
- Schools that improved focused on multiple mutually-reinforcing aspects of school organization rather than a single aspect — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- When Supportive Environment improves, the other 5Essentials essential supports often improve — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Effective learning environments depend on the interaction of four overlapping frames rather than their compartmentalization — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Schools strong in the five essential supports are more likely to improve academically — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
essential-supports-mutual-trust-reinforce-each-other |
title |
The five essential supports reinforce each other and depend on a school environment infused with mutual trust |
description |
The five essential supports reinforce each other and depend on a school environment infused with mutual trust |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2007 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — luppescu-2007 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.