Claims

Schools strong in the five essential supports are more likely to improve academically

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 2 studies · 2 associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2007 · 1 of 2 entries checked against their sources (automated) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Consortium studies show schools strong in the essential supports are more likely to improve academically, and weak schools more likely to be nonimproving. → Luppescu 2003

q2 i? Studies of Chicago Public Schools show that elementary and high schools strong in the essential supports are more likely to improve student learning over time. → Luppescu 2007

Evidence

Luppescu 2003

Luppescu, S., Hart, H., Jennings, S., & Dean, M. (2003). Torvalds Improving Chicago's Schools: 2003 Survey Report. Consortium on Chicago School Research. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/publications/improving-chicagos-schools-torvalds

q2 · i? · associational · r2

The report summarizes prior Consortium research on Chicago public schools since 1990 as demonstrating the importance of the five essential supports. No effect sizes or individual study details are printed; this is the report's own synthesis of its research base.

"Consortium studies show that schools that are strong in these essential supports are more likely to improve academically. Studies also show that schools that are weak are more likely to be academically nonimproving."

Luppescu 2007

Luppescu, Stuart, Hart, Holly, Rosenkranz, Todd, Montgomery, Nicholas, Sporte, Susan, and Sebring, Penny Bender. (2007). Consortium on Chicago School Research 2007 Individual School Survey Report. http://ccsr.uchicago.edu/ISR

q2 · i? · associational · r?

The report states this as a finding from CCSR's longitudinal studies of Chicago school improvement since 1990, citing the Essential Supports research (Sebring et al., 2006). No effect size is printed; the report says the finding is why "your report shows how strong or weak your school is on the fact ors that matter for improving student learning".

"Studies of Chicago Public Schools have shown that elementar y and high schools strong in the essential supports are more likely to improve student le arning over time."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id essential-supports-strength-linked-academic-improvement
aliases essential-supports-strong-schools-improve-learning
title Schools strong in the five essential supports are more likely to improve academically
description Schools strong in the five essential supports are more likely to improve academically
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2007
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — luppescu-2003, luppescu-2007

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.