Claims

Distributions of estimated intervention effects overstate the spread of true effects; adjusted empirical Bayes estimates reduce the spread by about 16% for cumulative semesters enrolled

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? For cumulative semesters enrolled through two semesters, the standard deviation of original OLS impact estimates (0.057) is 16% larger than the standard deviation of adjusted empirical Bayes estimates (0.049), which equals the estimated true-effect standard deviation. → Michael J. Weiss 2023

Evidence

Michael J. Weiss 2023

Michael J. Weiss, Marie-Andrée Somers, & Colin Hill. (2023). Empirical Benchmarks for Planning and Interpreting Causal Effects of Community College Interventions. Journal of Postsecondary Student Success 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.33009/fsop_jpss132759

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Methodological comparison in the Results section using Figure 1, which plots original OLS, empirical Bayes, and adjusted empirical Bayes impact estimates for 39 interventions on cumulative semesters enrolled. The article reports the OLS spread "is 16% larger" than the adjusted empirical Bayes spread (0.057 vs 0.049).

"First, notice that the spread of the ˆOrig jB is 16% larger than the spread of ˆAEB jB . Specifi- cally, /g11/g12/g32 0.057ˆOrig jSD B , whereas the /g11/g12/g32 0.049ˆAEB jSD B ."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.