Claims

Cross-intervention variation in community college intervention effects is substantial: for first-semester credits earned, the true-effect standard deviation (0.55 credits) exceeds the mean effect (0.48 credits)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? For credits earned through one semester, the estimated cross-intervention standard deviation of true effects (τ = 0.55 credits) is larger than the mean effect (β = 0.48 credits), with 10th–90th percentile effects from −0.03 to 1.29 credits. → Michael J. Weiss 2023

Evidence

Michael J. Weiss 2023

Michael J. Weiss, Marie-Andrée Somers, & Colin Hill. (2023). Empirical Benchmarks for Planning and Interpreting Causal Effects of Community College Interventions. Journal of Postsecondary Student Success 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.33009/fsop_jpss132759

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

FIRC estimates for the semester-1 credits-earned distribution in the Results section: mean β = 0.48 credits, τ = 0.55 credits, and percentiles of −0.03, 0.13, 0.48, 0.60, and 1.29. The article states τ being larger than β indicates "substantial variation in the effectiveness of interventions."

"This estimate of τ is larger in magnitude than the mean impact (β), indicating substantial variation in the effectiveness of interventions under study on this outcome at this time point."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.