Claims

Collected exam questions required no cognitive processes above apply and no originality in analysis or high-level interdependence

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? None of the collected physics and calculus exam questions required the analyze, evaluate, or create cognitive processes, nor the last levels of depth of analysis or interdependence. → Zakani 2019

Evidence

Zakani 2019

Zakani, S., Kaupp, J., Turner, R. D., & Frank, B. (2019). Analyzing implicit science and math outcomes in engineering and technology programs. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2019.1.7994

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Content-specialist coding of all 319 calculus and 205 physics exam questions on the first four framework dimensions found no questions at the highest levels. The article notes this is "consistent with the findings of a previous study on post-secondary calculus in the United States" (Tallman et al.).

"Of the material collected we did not find any questions that would require the last three levels of cognitive process (analyze, evaluate, or create), or the last levels in depth of analysis or interdependence, which are consistent with the findings of a previous study on post-secondary calculus in the United States"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id exam-questions-capped-at-apply-and-standardized-analysis
title Collected exam questions required no cognitive processes above apply and no originality in analysis or high-level interdependence
description Collected exam questions required no cognitive processes above apply and no originality in analysis or high-level interdependence
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — zakani-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.