Student-authored physics questions mostly require application or analysis, with under 5% at the lowest recall level¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In Physics 1A repositories for both years, less than 5% of questions fell in the lowest taxonomy category and the majority required application or analysis. → Bates 2013
Evidence¶
Bates 2013¶
Bates, S. P., Galloway, R. K., Riise, J., and Homer, D. (2013). Assessing the quality of a student-generated question repository. https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.2202 doi:10.48550/arxiv.1308.2202
q3 · i? · the article prints category percentages, no effect size · design · r2
Categorization of sampled Physics 1A questions (N=150 in 2010, N=200 in 2011) onto Anderson and Krathwohl's revised Bloom taxonomy levels, shown in Figure 1. The article reports "less than 5% for both years" in the lowest category and a majority requiring application or analysis. No effect size is printed.
"For both years, there is only a small proportion of questions in the lowest taxonomy category (less than 5% for both years) and the majority of student questions are categorized as those requiring application or analysis"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- University examination questions concentrate at the lower cognitive levels of Bloom's Taxonomy, dominated by comprehension and knowledge — reports the opposite
- Students answer lower-taxonomy-category questions more frequently, but only by a factor of about 2 — related
- 75% of student-authored physics questions met combined high-quality criteria (clear, correct, plausible distractors, above recall, adequate explanation) — related
- Question cognitive-level distributions differed significantly between years for Physics 1B but not Physics 1A — related
- Adult teachers' questions concentrate at low Bloom's levels, and cooperative learning's dialogue and questioning support critical thinking across Bloom's taxonomy — related
- Collected exam questions required no cognitive processes above apply and no originality in analysis or high-level interdependence — reports the opposite
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
student-questions-majority-above-recall-bloom |
title |
Student-authored physics questions mostly require application or analysis, with under 5% at the lowest recall level |
description |
Student-authored physics questions mostly require application or analysis, with under 5% at the lowest recall level |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2013 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — bates-2013 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.