Claims

Building example-tracing tutors with CTAT is 4–8 times as cost-effective as estimates for ITS development from the literature.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Creating example-tracing tutors with CTAT was shown to be 4–8 times as cost-effective as estimates for ITS development from the literature. → Aleven 2016

Evidence

Aleven 2016

Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., Sewall, J., van Velsen, M., Popescu, O., Demi, S., Ringenberg, M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2016). Example-Tracing Tutors: Intelligent Tutor Development for Non-programmers. International Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0088-2

q2 · i? · review · r1

The article's abstract states "Creating example-tracing tutors was shown to be 4–8 times as cost-effective as estimates for ITS development from the literature". This is a comparative cost-effectiveness claim based on prior work.

"Creating example-tracing tutors was shown to be 4–8 times as cost-effective as estimates for ITS development from the literature."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id example-tracing-tutors-4-8-times-cost-effective
title Building example-tracing tutors with CTAT is 4–8 times as cost-effective as estimates for ITS development from the literature.
description Building example-tracing tutors with CTAT is 4–8 times as cost-effective as estimates for ITS development from the literature.
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — aleven-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.