Claims

Model-tracing/cognitive tutors and example-tracing tutors are the predominant ITS types designed with authoring tools, together accounting for almost 40% of included studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Model-tracing/cognitive and example-tracing tutors were the most frequently authored ITS types, sharing Anderson's ACT Theory of Cognition as a common tutoring theory. → Diego Dermeval 2018

Evidence

Diego Dermeval 2018

Diego Dermeval, Ranilson Paiva, Ig Ibert Bittencourt, Julita Vassileva, Daniel Borges. (2018). Authoring Tools for Designing Intelligent Tutoring Systems: a Systematic Review of the Literature. Int J Artif Intell Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-017-0157-9

q3 · i? · review · r3

RQ2 classification of ITS types across the 33 studies, with categories defined during synthesis from the types explicitly stated by study authors. The review reports these two types account for "almost 40% of the total of papers included in this review", with example-tracing reducing technical costs by building cognitive models by demonstration.

"Model-tracing/Cognitive Tutor and Example-tracing ITS types are responsible for almost 40% of the total of papers included in this review."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id model-tracing-example-tracing-dominant-authored-types
title Model-tracing/cognitive tutors and example-tracing tutors are the predominant ITS types designed with authoring tools, together accounting for almost 40% of included studies
description Model-tracing/cognitive tutors and example-tracing tutors are the predominant ITS types designed with authoring tools, together accounting for almost 40% of included studies
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2018
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — diego-dermeval-2018

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.