Claims

Existing digital citizenship and online safety frameworks were appraised as too broad and not addressing serious online risks

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The review's appraisal concluded existing international frameworks were broad, touched lightly on low-level risks, and did not address serious risks such as cyberbullying and online sexual exploitation. → Walsh 2022

Evidence

Walsh 2022

Walsh, K., Pink, E., Ayling, N., Sondergeld, A., Dallaston, E., Tournas, P., Serry, E., Trotter, S., Spanos, T., & Rogic, N. (2022). Best Practice Framework for Online Safety Education: Results from a rapid review of the international literature, expert review, and stakeholder consultation. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 33, Article number: 100474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.100474

q2 · i? · review · r2

Stage 1 rapid review appraisal of eight internationally developed frameworks (e.g., UKCCIS, DQ Institute, Council of Europe, Common Sense, Ribble, iKeepSafe). The authors report the frameworks clustered into four digital citizenship themes but conclude they "did not address more serious risks such as cyberbullying". No effect size applies.

"Ourappraisaloftheseexistingframeworksconcluded that these were broad, touched lightly on low-level risks to children'sonlinesafety(suchasprivacy,fraud,andidentitytheft), and did not address more serious risks such as cyberbullying, onlinesexualexploitation,image-basedabuse,andexposureto inappropriatecontent"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id existing-frameworks-not-comprehensive-online-safety
title Existing digital citizenship and online safety frameworks were appraised as too broad and not addressing serious online risks
description Existing digital citizenship and online safety frameworks were appraised as too broad and not addressing serious online risks
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — walsh-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.