Stakeholders identified student groups underserved by online safety education, including children with disability and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2027: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Although the Framework was viewed as a universal intervention, stakeholders argued specific groups had been underserved in digital environments and online safety education, including children in early primary years, children with literacy-level challenges, culturally and linguistically diverse children, children with disability, and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children. → Walsh 2022
Evidence¶
Walsh 2022¶
Walsh, K., Pink, E., Ayling, N., Sondergeld, A., Dallaston, E., Tournas, P., Serry, E., Trotter, S., Spanos, T., & Rogic, N. (2022). Best Practice Framework for Online Safety Education: Results from a rapid review of the international literature, expert review, and stakeholder consultation. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 33, Article number: 100474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.100474
q2 · i? · design · r2
Stage 2 interview and focus group thematic analysis of stakeholder views on Framework implementation and inclusion. Stakeholders argued strongly that "specificgroupshad beenunderservedindigitalenvironments,generally,andonline safetyeducation,specifically"; groups named include children with disability and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children. Qualitative finding; no effect size.
"Althoughstudentswereplacedatthecentrewith actionstatementssuchas'focusonthestudent'(draftFramework, Action1.1),stakeholdersarguedstronglythatspecificgroupshad beenunderservedindigitalenvironments,generally,andonline safetyeducation,specifically."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Expert review and stakeholder consultation established strong consensus on the need for and acceptability of the Framework
- Existing digital citizenship and online safety frameworks were appraised as too broad and not addressing serious online risks
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
underserved-groups-online-safety-education |
title |
Stakeholders identified student groups underserved by online safety education, including children with disability and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children |
description |
Stakeholders identified student groups underserved by online safety education, including children with disability and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
recheck_by |
2027 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — walsh-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.