In the laboratory experiment, feedback order effects on next-day recognition were specific to congruent trials, with a trend for feedback boosting incongruent-item memory regardless of timing¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The three-way feedback-by-order-by-congruence interaction on recognition was significant (χ2(1) = 4.74, p = 0.03); for incongruent items, feedback showed only a non-significant trend toward improving memory (OR = 1.62, p = 0.08) independent of order (p = 0.55). → Vavra 2023
Evidence¶
Vavra 2023¶
Vavra, P., Sokolovič, L., Porcu, E., Ripollés, P., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., & Noesselt, T. (2023). Entering into a self-regulated learning mode prevents detrimental effects of feedback removal on memory. npj Science of Learning, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-022-00150-x
q3 · i? · causal · r2
GLMM on day-2 recognition in the laboratory recognition group (N = 29) contrasting congruent and incongruent items; incongruent items were recognized above chance in all four conditions (all p's < 0.044).
"In contrast, this pattern was absent for the new-words, which had been associated with two incongruent sentences (3-way interaction of feedback by order by congruence: χ2(1) = 4.74, p = 0.03). We observed a trend for feedback improving the memory for the incongruent new-words (for incongruent only, main effect of feedback: odds-ratio = 1.62 ± 0.45, p = 0.08)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- In the laboratory experiment, next-day recognition was higher for congruent new-word meanings than for incongruent items, while day-1 performance showed the opposite pattern — related
- In the laboratory experiment, withdrawing feedback in the second half of learning significantly lowered next-day recognition of congruent word meanings, while adding feedback later did not impair recognition — related
- In an online replication, adding feedback in the second half improved immediate extraction of concrete word meanings for congruent trials only, replicating the laboratory effect — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
exp1-congruent-specific-feedback-memory-interaction |
title |
In the laboratory experiment, feedback order effects on next-day recognition were specific to congruent trials, with a trend for feedback boosting incongruent-item memory regardless of timing |
description |
In the laboratory experiment, feedback order effects on next-day recognition were specific to congruent trials, with a trend for feedback boosting incongruent-item memory regardless of timing |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — vavra-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.