In an online replication, adding feedback in the second half improved immediate extraction of concrete word meanings for congruent trials only, replicating the laboratory effect¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Participants extracted concrete meanings best when receiving feedback (47.8%) after first doing the task without feedback (40.5%), with no significant change for the group starting with feedback, and no significant incongruent-trial effects. → Vavra 2023
Evidence¶
Vavra 2023¶
Vavra, P., Sokolovič, L., Porcu, E., Ripollés, P., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., & Noesselt, T. (2023). Entering into a self-regulated learning mode prevents detrimental effects of feedback removal on memory. npj Science of Learning, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-022-00150-x
q3 · i? · causal · r2
GLMM on day-1 meaning extraction in the online experiment (N = 73, typed responses, forced answering); congruence-by-order (χ2(1) = 4.25, p = 0.039) and three-way interaction were significant.
"Participants extracted concrete meanings best when they receiv- ing feedback (47.8%) after having first done the task without any feedback (40.5%, odds-ratio = 1.34 ± 0.14, p = 0.005) while the group of participants who started with feedback did not change their performance significantly replicating the results from the first experiment"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- In a laboratory word-learning task, introducing feedback in the second half of learning improved immediate meaning-extraction performance, while withdrawing feedback produced no significant drop on day 1 — related
- In the laboratory experiment, feedback order effects on next-day recognition were specific to congruent trials, with a trend for feedback boosting incongruent-item memory regardless of timing — related
- In the laboratory experiment, next-day recognition was higher for congruent new-word meanings than for incongruent items, while day-1 performance showed the opposite pattern — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
exp2-adding-feedback-improves-congruent-extraction |
title |
In an online replication, adding feedback in the second half improved immediate extraction of concrete word meanings for congruent trials only, replicating the laboratory effect |
description |
In an online replication, adding feedback in the second half improved immediate extraction of concrete word meanings for congruent trials only, replicating the laboratory effect |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — vavra-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.