In Experiment 1, reminders improved associative recognition accuracy for picture pairs (main effect of reminder)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i3 In a within-subjects experiment, pairs that received a reminder on Day 2 were recognised more accurately on Day 3 than pairs that received no reminder. → Michael Batashvili 2022

Evidence¶

Michael Batashvili 2022¶

Michael Batashvili, Rona Sheaffer, Maya Katz, Yoav Doron, Noam Kempler and Daniel A. Levy. (2022). Behavioural reconsolidation interference not observed in a within-subjects design. npj Science of Learning 7:26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-022-00143-w

q2 · i3 · causal · r2

A 2×2 repeated-measures ANOVA on associative recognition accuracy in a three-day within-subjects experiment with 40 young adults. The reminder main effect was significant, with reminder pairs at Mean = 92% versus 85% for no reminder. The article prints "η² = 0.22" for this effect.

"For accuracy, there was a significant main effect of reminder, F(1,39) = 29.43, p < 0.001, η² = 0.22, BF 10 = 0.75, showing that participants had greater accuracy for pairs where a reminder was employed"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• In Experiment 1, reminder+interference produced better associative recognition than interference alone, contrary to reconsolidation-interference predictions — related
• In Experiment 1, reminders speeded and interference slowed recognition response times, with reminder+interference faster than interference alone — related
• Across item recognition, associative recognition, and free recall paradigms, reminder-potentiated behavioural interference did not impair declarative memory within-subjects — a broader claim this one bears on
• In Experiment 1, reminder+interference yielded greater recollection strength than interference alone on Remember/Know judgments — related