Across item recognition, associative recognition, and free recall paradigms, reminder-potentiated behavioural interference did not impair declarative memory within-subjects¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Across three within-subjects experiments (and three prior item-recognition experiments), providing a reminder before interference did not impair memory compared to interference alone. → Michael Batashvili 2022

Evidence¶

Michael Batashvili 2022¶

Michael Batashvili, Rona Sheaffer, Maya Katz, Yoav Doron, Noam Kempler and Daniel A. Levy. (2022). Behavioural reconsolidation interference not observed in a within-subjects design. npj Science of Learning 7:26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-022-00143-w

q2 · i? · causal · r2

The general discussion summarises the three experiments reported here (associative recognition and two free-recall experiments), together with three prior item-recognition experiments, as showing no behavioural reconsolidation interference in within-subjects paradigms.

"Nonetheless, provid- ing a reminder before introducing retroactive interference did not impair memory compared to simple interference in any of these paradigms."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

Long-Term Memory — outcome: instruction changes it

In Experiment 1, reminder+interference yielded greater recollection strength than interference alone on Remember/Know judgments — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
In Experiment 1, reminders improved associative recognition accuracy for picture pairs (main effect of reminder) — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
In Experiment 1, reminder+interference produced better associative recognition than interference alone, contrary to reconsolidation-interference predictions — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
In Experiment 1, reminders speeded and interference slowed recognition response times, with reminder+interference faster than interference alone — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
In Experiment 2, reminders improved story recall, but interference had no significant effect on recall or recognition — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
In Experiment 3, the reminder × interference interaction on story recall was significant but no pairwise comparison survived Bonferroni correction — a narrower finding that bears on this claim

Page metadata

Field	Value
`type`	`claim`
`id`	`no-behavioural-reconsolidation-interference-within-subjects`
`title`	`Across item recognition, associative recognition, and free recall paradigms, reminder-potentiated behavioural interference did not impair declarative memory within-subjects`
`description`	`Across item recognition, associative recognition, and free recall paradigms, reminder-potentiated behavioural interference did not impair declarative memory within-subjects`
`status`	`review`
`evidence_strength`	`moderate`
`newest_evidence`	`2022`
`generated`	by `process:wiki-ingest` on `2026-10-26`
`trust`	unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
`sources`	1 — `michael-batashvili-2022`

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.