Claims

The authors' findings add to evidence that expanding-interval schedules are not more effective than fixed-interval schedules of practice

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2007 · checked against its sources 2026-10-19 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Comparison of the 1-5-9 expanding and 5-5-5 fixed conventional schedules in Experiment 1 showed no advantage for the expanding schedule. → Pyc 2007

Evidence

Pyc 2007

Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2007). Examining the efficiency of schedules of distributed retrieval practice. Memory & Cognition, 35(8), 1917-1927. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03193420

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Authors' interpretation in the General Discussion, drawing on Experiment 1's inclusion of both an expanding (1-5-9) and a fixed (5-5-5) interval conventional schedule, which performed similarly. They suggest future comparisons of conventional with variable schedules need only include a fixed-interval schedule.

"Our findings add to the growing body of literature suggesting that expanding-interval schedules are not more effective than fixed-interval schedules."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id expanding-not-better-than-fixed-interval
title The authors' findings add to evidence that expanding-interval schedules are not more effective than fixed-interval schedules of practice
description The authors' findings add to evidence that expanding-interval schedules are not more effective than fixed-interval schedules of practice
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2007
source_checked 2026-10-19
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — pyc-2007

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.