The experimental group's brain-based learning management scores were significantly higher than the control group's after training (t = 47.98, .05)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The experimental group of trained teachers scored higher than the control group on brain-based learning management with statistical significance of .05 (t = 47.98). → Chaiwat Waree 2017
Evidence¶
Chaiwat Waree 2017¶
Chaiwat Waree. (2017). An Increasing of Primary School Teachers' Competency in Brain-Based Learning. International Education Studies, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n3p176
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Two-sample independent t-test comparing the trained experimental group with the untrained control group on the 60-item brain-based learning management test. The article reports t = 47.98 and a significant difference at .05; no effect size is printed.
"The score of the experimental group was higher than that of control group with statistical significance of .05."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.