Before their first presentation, students in the two experimental groups did not differ in anxiety, preparedness, or motivation¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Independent t-tests showed no pre-presentation differences between the video-enhanced and text-based groups on anxiety, preparedness, or motivation. → Rob J. Nadolski 2021
Evidence¶
Rob J. Nadolski 2021¶
Rob J. Nadolski, Hans G. K. Hummel, Ellen Rusman, Kevin Ackermans. (2021). Rubric formats for the formative assessment of oral presentation skills acquisition in secondary education. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10030-7
q3 · i? · causal · r1
A short six-item online questionnaire administered just before the first oral presentation (experimental groups only; the control group questionnaire was not administered) served as a control check. The "independent t-test comparing the similarity of participants in both experimental groups" showed no differences on any of the three factors. Teachers assessed the control group as similar on these factors.
"An independent t-test comparing the similarity of participants in both experimental groups before their first presentation for anxiety, preparedness, motivation showed no difference, with t(1,98) = 1.32 and p = 0.19 for anxiety, t(1,98) = − 0.14 and p = 0.89 for preparedness, and t(1,98) = − 1.24 and p = 0.22 for motivation"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Formative assessment with validated analytic rubrics in the Viewbrics tool produced higher oral presentation performance than conventional rating-scale rubrics in Dutch secondary education — related
- Video-enhanced analytic rubrics did not significantly outperform text-based analytic rubrics on oral presentation performance, though a marginal trend favored video-enhanced rubrics — related
- An LLM-based Q&A practice system reduced presentation anxiety and improved perceived preparedness among first-time conference participants — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
experimental-groups-similar-anxiety-preparedness-motivation |
title |
Before their first presentation, students in the two experimental groups did not differ in anxiety, preparedness, or motivation |
description |
Before their first presentation, students in the two experimental groups did not differ in anxiety, preparedness, or motivation |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — rob-j-nadolski-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.