Formative assessment with validated analytic rubrics in the Viewbrics tool produced higher oral presentation performance than conventional rating-scale rubrics in Dutch secondary education¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2021 · checked against its sources 2026-10-29 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 Both experimental groups using analytic rubrics significantly outperformed the control group using conventional rubrics at both measurement moments. → Rob J. Nadolski 2021
Evidence¶
Rob J. Nadolski 2021¶
Rob J. Nadolski, Hans G. K. Hummel, Ellen Rusman, Kevin Ackermans. (2021). Rubric formats for the formative assessment of oral presentation skills acquisition in secondary education. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10030-7
q3 · i3 · causal · r2
Repeated-measures mixed ANOVA with 158 first-year Dutch secondary students randomized by class to three conditions. Between-subjects tests showed both experimental groups outperforming the control group, with "F(2, 156) = 118.97, p < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.59". A Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc analysis confirmed experimental groups significantly (p < 0.01) outperformed the control group at both moments.
"Tests of between-subjects effects showed significant differences between conditions, with F(2, 156) = 118.97, p < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.59, and both experimental groups outperforming the control group as expected (so we could accept H1)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Video-enhanced analytic rubrics did not significantly outperform text-based analytic rubrics on oral presentation performance, though a marginal trend favored video-enhanced rubrics — related
- The authors expect VER groups to develop richer mental models, produce higher quality feedback and show increased complex skill performance, to be tested in four Dutch classrooms — related
- Oral presentation performance improved significantly over time, but only control-group students showed statistically significant growth between the two presentations — related
- An expert appraisal workshop of an early VER prototype by twenty international experts stressed the importance of annotation to connect rubric and video — related
- Text-based rubrics alone provide insufficient contextual, dynamic and procedural information to support rich mental model development of complex skills — related
- Before their first presentation, students in the two experimental groups did not differ in anxiety, preparedness, or motivation — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
analytic-rubrics-outperform-conventional-rubrics-oral-presentation |
title |
Formative assessment with validated analytic rubrics in the Viewbrics tool produced higher oral presentation performance than conventional rating-scale rubrics in Dutch secondary education |
description |
Formative assessment with validated analytic rubrics in the Viewbrics tool produced higher oral presentation performance than conventional rating-scale rubrics in Dutch secondary education |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
source_checked |
2026-10-29 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — rob-j-nadolski-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.