Experts' AHP priorities cluster into three groups differing by seniority and LA expertise¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Hierarchical cluster analysis of experts' AHP priorities yielded three clusters, with senior experts prioritizing available resources and junior experts prioritizing ethics & data governance. → Svetec 2026

Evidence¶

Svetec 2026¶

Svetec, B., Divjak, B., & Kadoić, N. (2026). From learning analytics to educational interventions: enhancing decision-making and learning design. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-026-00620-x

q2 · i? · design · r2

Hierarchical cluster analysis (Ward's method) on correlations between the 12 experts' AHP priorities pointed to three clusters; the article reports "The average silhou - ette was 0.48 (Fig. 7), suggesting moderate cluster quality", with cluster silhouettes of 0.57, 0.35 and 0.49.

"The average silhou - ette was 0.48 (Fig. 7), suggesting moderate cluster quality."

Svetec 2026 (2)¶

Svetec, B., Divjak, B., & Kadoić, N. (2026). From learning analytics to educational interventions: enhancing decision-making and learning design. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-026-00620-x

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Cluster profiles from the discussion: cluster 1 (four senior professors) assigned the highest priority to available resources; cluster 2 (three junior experts) to ethics & data governance; cluster 3 (five experts with decision-making experience) to institutional strategic orientation or stakeholder engagement.

"the cluster analysis pointed out that senior experts in LA (cluster 1) found available resources to have the highest influence on the implementation of LA-based interventions."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Available resources received the highest AHP strength-of-influence priority (0.1753), marginally above institutional strategic orientation (0.1715) — related
• Institutional strategic orientation received the highest overall SNAP priority (0.2072) among the seven enablers — related
• Seven enablers of LA-based educational interventions were identified and validated by an international expert panel — related
• Experts rank Curriculum System and Content Design as the highest-priority dimension for AI certificate program evaluation, with Cross-Cultural Adaptability lowest