Claims

Experienced educators ranked experience-drawing and imagination questions highest and factual and technique questions lowest among eighteen literature study questions

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 1921 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? One hundred and thirty-one experienced persons ranked questions drawing on pupils' related experiences and imaginative realization highest, and matters of fact and literary technique low. → L. Z 1921

Evidence

L. Z 1921

L. Z. (1921). New Publications: Review of Empirical Studies in School Reading. The Journal of Educational Psychology. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Empirical+Studies+in+School+Reading

q2 · i? · associational · r1

A survey in which 131 persons of long school experience ranked eighteen questions as aids in the study of literature; rankings "emphasize the value of questions which draw on the pupil's related experiences" and imagination, while matters of fact and literary technique were ranked low.

"One hundred and thirty-one persons of long experience in school-work were asked to rank eighteen questions in the order of their merit as aids in the study of literature. These rankings emphasize the value of questions which draw on the pupil's related experiences and assist him to realize in imagination the experiences of the poet."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id expert-rankings-literature-study-questions
title Experienced educators ranked experience-drawing and imagination questions highest and factual and technique questions lowest among eighteen literature study questions
description Experienced educators ranked experience-drawing and imagination questions highest and factual and technique questions lowest among eighteen literature study questions
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 1921
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — l-z-1921

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.