Expertise did not significantly predict gaze proportions toward student materials or teacher materials in either attentional or communicative gaze¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Expertise did not predict attentional student material gaze (p = .30), attentional teacher material gaze (p = .12), communicative student material gaze (p = .80), or communicative teacher material gaze (p = .23). → McIntyre 2019
Evidence¶
McIntyre 2019¶
McIntyre, N. A., Jarodzka, H., & Klassen, R. M. (2019). Capturing teacher priorities: Using real-world eye-tracking to investigate expert teacher priorities across two cultures. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.003
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Null beta-regression findings from the real-world eye-tracking study of 40 teachers: no statistically significant expertise differences in material-gaze proportions; equivalence was not tested. The authors conclude prioritisation of materials does not mark out expertise status.
"Expertise did not predict attentional student material gaze (p = .30) or attentional teacher material gaze (p = .12)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Prior Knowledge — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Culture did not predict any attentional gaze proportions, but Hong Kong teachers looked more at teacher materials and UK teachers more at non-instructional regions during communicative gaze — related
- Teacher scanpaths are most dissimilar across combined expertise-and-culture sub-groups, significantly for attentional gaze and marginally for communicative gaze — related
- Teacher scanpaths are more similar within expertise levels than across expertise once culture is controlled, for both attentional and communicative gaze — related
- Expert teachers begin gaze sequences with student fixation and return to students throughout, whereas Hong Kong experts intersperse student scans that UK experts never use — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
expertise-null-material-gaze |
title |
Expertise did not significantly predict gaze proportions toward student materials or teacher materials in either attentional or communicative gaze |
description |
Expertise did not significantly predict gaze proportions toward student materials or teacher materials in either attentional or communicative gaze |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — mcintyre-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.