Explicit correction improves adult L2 learners' responses on corrected suffixation items during the feedback session¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q3
Currency · newest study 1992 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Experimental subjects who received correction gave feedback-session responses that differed in favor of the experimental groups relative to comparison subjects who were never corrected. → Susanne Carroll 1992
Evidence¶
Susanne Carroll 1992¶
Susanne Carroll, Merrill Swain, and Yves Roberge. (1992). The role of feedback in adult second language acquisition: Error correction and morphological generalizations. Applied Psycholinguistics, Volume 13, Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400005555
q3 · i? · causal · r?
In the experimental study, 79 adult native speakers of English learning French were individually trained on two suffixation rules; experimental subjects received correction for erroneous responses. Analyses showed "differences in favor of the experimental groups" on feedback responses. No effect size is printed.
"Analyses of feedback responses indicated differences in favor of the experimental groups, but comparisons of guessing responses between experimental and comparison groups showed no evidence of learned generalizations."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Learning of absolute exceptions in French suffixation was more likely among advanced than intermediate adult learners — related
- Explicit correction did not produce evidence of learned morphological generalizations to novel stimuli in adult L2 learners — related
- Corrective feedback on second-language errors has a significant effect on L2 development that is maintained on delayed tests — a broader claim this one bears on
- Metalinguistic feedback and recasts, but not clarification requests, significantly improve Iranian EFL learners' wh-question performance on an immediate post-test — related
- Metalinguistic feedback produced system learning, generalizing to verbs not included in the treatment — related
- Design studies indicated metalinguistic information about how English spelling and pronunciation work helped adult learners remember and apply what they learned — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
explicit-correction-improves-feedback-session-responses |
title |
Explicit correction improves adult L2 learners' responses on corrected suffixation items during the feedback session |
description |
Explicit correction improves adult L2 learners' responses on corrected suffixation items during the feedback session |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
1992 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — susanne-carroll-1992 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.