Claims

Explicit metapragmatic instruction on requests raises request speech act awareness of intermediate EFL learners relative to regular institute instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After ten sessions of explicit metapragmatic instruction, the experimental group scored significantly higher than the control group on a request DCT posttest (t = 9.299 > critical t = 2.00, p < .05). → Masouleh et al. 2014

Evidence

Masouleh et al. 2014

Fatemeh Abdollahizadeh Masouleh, Masoumeh Arjmandi, Fereydoon Vahdany. (2014). The Effect of Explicit Metapragmatic Instruction on Request Speech Act Awareness of Intermediate EFL Students at Institute Level. Universal Journal of Educational Research 2(7): 504-511. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2014.020702

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experiment with 30 control and 30 experimental intermediate EFL learners at an Iranian English institute; independent t-test on posttest DCT scores. The article reports "the p value of 0.00< 0.05" and observed t (9.299) exceeding critical t (2.00); no effect size is printed.

"the mean of the posttest of the control group was 14.63 and that of experimental group was 18.30. A significant difference was between the two groups in terms of the mean. In addition, the p value of 0.00< 0.05 indicated that the two groups were different significantly."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.