Claims

The authors interpret their results as showing that explicit metapragmatic instruction provides input enhancement that facilitates interlanguage pragmatic development

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The authors attribute the gains to input enhancement raising learners' awareness of input features combined with productive classroom activities. → Masouleh et al. 2014

Evidence

Masouleh et al. 2014

Fatemeh Abdollahizadeh Masouleh, Masoumeh Arjmandi, Fereydoon Vahdany. (2014). The Effect of Explicit Metapragmatic Instruction on Request Speech Act Awareness of Intermediate EFL Students at Institute Level. Universal Journal of Educational Research 2(7): 504-511. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2014.020702

q1 · i? · causal · r2

Authors' interpretation in the Discussions section, not a separately tested result; the article offers this mechanism account alongside its experimental findings without an additional test of the mechanism.

"explicit metapragmatic instruction by providing input enhancement in the L2 classroom, raising L2 students' awareness about the input features, and entangling them in productive class activities and language use precipitated and facilitated interlanguage pragmatic development to a considerable degree."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.