The authors interpret their results as showing that explicit metapragmatic instruction provides input enhancement that facilitates interlanguage pragmatic development¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q1
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? The authors attribute the gains to input enhancement raising learners' awareness of input features combined with productive classroom activities. → Masouleh et al. 2014
Evidence¶
Masouleh et al. 2014¶
Fatemeh Abdollahizadeh Masouleh, Masoumeh Arjmandi, Fereydoon Vahdany. (2014). The Effect of Explicit Metapragmatic Instruction on Request Speech Act Awareness of Intermediate EFL Students at Institute Level. Universal Journal of Educational Research 2(7): 504-511. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2014.020702
q1 · i? · causal · r2
Authors' interpretation in the Discussions section, not a separately tested result; the article offers this mechanism account alongside its experimental findings without an additional test of the mechanism.
"explicit metapragmatic instruction by providing input enhancement in the L2 classroom, raising L2 students' awareness about the input features, and entangling them in productive class activities and language use precipitated and facilitated interlanguage pragmatic development to a considerable degree."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Explicit metapragmatic instruction on requests raises request speech act awareness of intermediate EFL learners relative to regular institute instruction — related
- Prompts raised learners' pragmatic awareness of refusals more than explicit feedback or control after a 10-week treatment — related
- Explicit information mediated PI's superiority over PBI on interpretation: PI-EI and PBI-EI performed equally, so the PI+EI advantage was attributed to EI, not structured input alone — related
- Explicit grammar teaching outperforms implicit teaching; one review found the advantage only for complex rules, but a meta-analysis found it for simple rules too — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.