Claims

Explicit instruction of refusals significantly improves Iranian EFL learners' pragmatic performance of refusals

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The explicit instruction group showed a statistically significant pretest-to-posttest improvement in pragmatic production of refusals (Exact Sig. 2-tailed = .000). → Farrokhi and Atashian 2012

Evidence

Farrokhi and Atashian 2012

Farahman Farrokhi, Soheil Atashian. (2012). The Role of Refusal Instruction in Pragmatic Development. World Journal of Education, Vol. 2, No. 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/wje.v2n4p85

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental pretest/posttest study of 60 upper-intermediate EFL learners rated on open-ended DCTs by two native-speaker raters and analyzed with Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test. The explicit group's Exact Sig. 2-tailed of .000 indicates a significant pretest-posttest change, described as "a drastic change in subjects' performance of refusals".

"As illustrated by table 4, the P-value (Exact Sig. 2-tailed) for control, explicit and implicit groups is 1.000, .000, and .013 respectively."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.